Management Consultancy
Defence Industry
Background
The client specialized in producing advanced communication and surveillance systems for defense and homeland security applications. Operating in a geopolitically sensitive sector, the company maintained strict compliance with national security regulations but had no structured approach to environmental or social risk management. The rising prominence of ESG in investor mandates—even in defense-adjacent portfolios—prompted stakeholders to request transparency on climate impacts, ethical sourcing, cybersecurity governance, and workforce diversity. Meanwhile, the company was preparing for a capital raise to fund R&D for dual-use technologies but lacked ESG-integrated financial narratives or taxonomy-aligned investment plans. This created a disconnect between the company’s innovation capabilities and its access to mission-aligned capital, especially from European and multilateral sources.
Case Study
The Problem
Taxonomy Misalignment: Defence revenues counted against banks’ green-asset ratios, shrinking the potential lender pool.
Perceived Reputational Risk: Numerous institutional investors apply blanket exclusions to the sector.
Carbon-Heavy Operations: Legacy furnaces and solvent-based etching left the plant’s emissions well above the industry median.
Leverage Sensitivities: Rating agencies monitored balance-sheet headroom closely after a recent acquisition.
While the sector faced exemptions under certain sustainable finance regulations, investor and stakeholder demands for transparency and responsible innovation were growing. The absence of climate scenario analysis, ESG due diligence frameworks, and ethical risk governance reduced the company’s credibility with institutional investors and export market stakeholders.